Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/35615
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWebb, Rebeccaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorUddin, Nazihahen_UK
dc.contributor.authorConstantinou, Georginaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorFord, Elizabethen_UK
dc.contributor.authorEaster, Abigailen_UK
dc.contributor.authorShakespeare, Judyen_UK
dc.contributor.authorHann, Agnesen_UK
dc.contributor.authorRoberts, Niaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorAlderdice, Fionaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorSinesi, Andreaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorCoates, Roseen_UK
dc.contributor.authorHogg, Sallyen_UK
dc.contributor.authorAyers, Susanen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-30T01:12:19Z-
dc.date.available2023-11-30T01:12:19Z-
dc.date.issued2023-07en_UK
dc.identifier.othere066703en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/35615-
dc.description.abstractPerinatal mental health (PMH) problems are common and can have an adverse impact on women and their families. However, research suggests that a substantial proportion of women with PMH problems do not access care. Objectives: To synthesise the results from previous systematic reviews of barriers and facilitators to women to seeking help, accessing help, and engaging in PMH care, and to suggest recommendations for clinical practice and policy. Design: A meta-review of systematic reviews. Review methods: Seven databases were searched and reviewed using a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses search strategy. Studies that focused on the views of women seeking help and accessing PMH care were included. Data were analysed using thematic synthesis. Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews-2 was used to assess review methodology. To improve validity of results, a qualitative sensitivity analysis was conducted to assess whether themes remained consistent across all reviews, regardless of their quality rating. Results: A total of 32 reviews were included. A wide range of barriers and facilitators to women accessing PMH care were identified. These mapped across a multilevel model of influential factors (individual, healthcare professional, interpersonal, organisational, political and societal) and across the care pathway (from decision to consult to receiving care). Evidence-based recommendations to support the design and delivery of PMH care were produced based on identified barriers and facilitators. Conclusion: The identified barriers and facilitators point to a complex interplay of many factors, highlighting the need for an international effort to increase awareness of PMH problems, reduce mental health stigma, and provide woman-centred, flexible care, delivered by well trained and culturally sensitive primary care, maternity, and psychiatric health professionals. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42019142854.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherBMJen_UK
dc.relationWebb R, Uddin N, Constantinou G, Ford E, Easter A, Shakespeare J, Hann A, Roberts N, Alderdice F, Sinesi A, Coates R, Hogg S & Ayers S (2023) Meta-review of the barriers and facilitators to women accessing perinatal mental healthcare. <i>BMJ Open</i>, 13 (7), Art. No.: e066703. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066703en_UK
dc.rights© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectGeneral Medicineen_UK
dc.titleMeta-review of the barriers and facilitators to women accessing perinatal mental healthcareen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066703en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid37474171en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleBMJ Openen_UK
dc.citation.issn2044-6055en_UK
dc.citation.volume13en_UK
dc.citation.issue7en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.funderNIHR National Institute for Health Researchen_UK
dc.author.emailandrea.sinesi@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date20/07/2023en_UK
dc.description.notes.en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationCity University Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationCity University Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationCity University Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBrighton and Sussex Medical Schoolen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationKing's College Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationIndependenten_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNational Childbirth Trusten_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Oxforden_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNuffield Healthen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNMAHPen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationCity University Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Cambridgeen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationCity University Londonen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:001047062500040en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85165489931en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1953708en_UK
dc.date.accepted2023-06-28en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2023-06-28en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2023-11-13en_UK
dc.relation.funderprojectMethods of assessing perinatal anxiety: The acceptability, effectiveness and feasibility of different approachesen_UK
dc.relation.funderref17/105/16en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorWebb, Rebecca|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorUddin, Nazihah|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorConstantinou, Georgina|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorFord, Elizabeth|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorEaster, Abigail|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorShakespeare, Judy|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorHann, Agnes|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorRoberts, Nia|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorAlderdice, Fiona|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorSinesi, Andrea|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorCoates, Rose|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorHogg, Sally|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorAyers, Susan|en_UK
local.rioxx.project17/105/16|National Institute for Health Research|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000272en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2023-11-21en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2023-11-21|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameMeta review 2023 BMJ Open.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source2044-6055en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Meta review 2023 BMJ Open.pdfFulltext - Published Version2.16 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.