Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/35770
Appears in Collections:Management, Work and Organisation Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Common health assets protocol: a mixed-methods, realist evaluation and economic appraisal of how community-led organisations (CLOs) impact on the health and well-being of people living in deprived areas
Author(s): Baker, Rachel Mairi
Ahmed, Mohasin
Bertotti, Marcello
Cassidy, John
Chipuriro, Rejoice
Clewett, Emma
Donaldson, Cam
Elders, Andrew
Fenge, Lee Ann
Fox, Julie
Galway, Karen
Gildea, Aideen
McGuinness, Aileen
McLean, Jennifer
Roy, Michael J
Contact Email: michael.roy1@stir.ac.uk
Issue Date: 2023
Date Deposited: 17-Jan-2024
Citation: Baker RM, Ahmed M, Bertotti M, Cassidy J, Chipuriro R, Clewett E, Donaldson C, Elders A, Fenge LA, Fox J, Galway K, Gildea A, McGuinness A, McLean J & Roy MJ (2023) Common health assets protocol: a mixed-methods, realist evaluation and economic appraisal of how community-led organisations (CLOs) impact on the health and well-being of people living in deprived areas. <i>BMJ open</i>, 13, Art. No.: e069979. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069979
Abstract: Introduction . This research investigates how community-led organisations’ (CLOs’) use of assets-based approaches improves health and well-being, and how that might be different in different contexts. Assets-based approaches involve ‘doing with’ rather than ‘doing to’ and bring people in communities together to achieve positive change using their own knowledge, skills and experience. Some studies have shown that such approaches can have a positive effect on health and well-being. However, research is limited, and we know little about which approaches lead to which outcomes and how different contexts might affect success. Methods and analysis. Using a realist approach, we will work with 15 CLOs based in disadvantaged communities in England, Scotland and Northern Ireland. A realist synthesis of review papers, and a policy analysis in different contexts, precedes qualitative interviews and workshops with stakeholders, to find out how CLOs’ programmes work and identify existing data. We will explore participants’ experiences through: a Q methodology study; participatory photography workshops; qualitative interviews and measure outcomes using a longitudinal survey, with 225 CLO participants, to assess impact for people who connect with the CLOs. An economic analysis will estimate costs and benefits to participants, for different contexts and mechanisms. A ‘Lived Experience Panel’ of people connected with our CLOs as participants or volunteers, will ensure the appropriateness of the research, interpretation and reporting of findings. Ethics and dissemination. This project, research tools and consent processes have been approved by the Glasgow Caledonian University School of Health and Life Sciences Ethics Committee, and affirmed by Ethics Committees at Bournemouth University, Queen’s University Belfast and the University of East London. Common Health Assets does not involve any National Health Service sites, staff or patients. Findings will be presented through social media, project website, blogs, policy briefings, journal articles, conferences and visually in short digital stories, and photographic exhibitions.
DOI Link: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069979
Rights: This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made.
Notes: Additional authors: Sarkis Manoukian, Helen Mason, Antony Morgan, Jill Mulholland, Liam O'Hare, Andrew Paterson, Sam Porter, Jack Rendall, Peter Seaman, Merron Simpson, Artur Steiner, Michael P Kelly
Licence URL(s): http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
e069979.full.pdfFulltext - Published Version3.23 MBAdobe PDFView/Open



This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.