Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/37019
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGiltenane, Martinaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorO’Mahony, Aoifeen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBianchim, Mayara Silveiraen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBooth, Andrewen_UK
dc.contributor.authorHarden, Angelaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorHoughton, Catherineen_UK
dc.contributor.authorFrance, Emma Fen_UK
dc.contributor.authorAmes, Heatheren_UK
dc.contributor.authorFlemming, Kateen_UK
dc.contributor.authorSutcliffe, Katyen_UK
dc.contributor.authorGarside, Ruthen_UK
dc.contributor.authorPantoja, Tomasen_UK
dc.contributor.authorNoyes, Janeen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-30T00:01:37Z-
dc.date.available2025-04-30T00:01:37Z-
dc.date.issued2025-05en_UK
dc.identifier.othere70023en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/37019-
dc.description.abstractBackground Over ten years since the first qualitative evidence synthesis (QES) was published in the Cochrane Library, QES and mixed-methods reviews (MMR) with a qualitative component have become increasingly common and influential in healthcare research and policy development. The quality of such reviews and the completeness with which they are reported is therefore of paramount importance. Aim This review aimed to assess the reporting quality of published QESs and MMRs with a qualitative component in the Cochrane Library. Methods All published QESs and MMRs were identified from the Cochrane Library. A bespoke framework developed by key international experts based on the Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC), Enhancing Transparency in Reporting the Synthesis of Qualitative Research (ENTREQ) and meta-ethnography reporting guidance (eMERGe) was used to code the quality of reporting of QESs and MMRs. Results Thirty-one reviews were identified, including 11 MMRs. The reporting quality of the QESs and MMRs published by Cochrane varied considerably. Based on the criteria within our framework, just over a quarter (8, 26%) were considered to meet satisfactory reporting standards, 10 (32%) could have provided clearer or more detailed descriptions in their reporting, just over a quarter (8, 26%) provided poor quality or insufficient descriptions and five (16%) omitted descriptions relevant to our framework. Conclusion This assessment offers important insights into the reporting practices prevalent in these review types. Methodology and reporting have changed considerably over time. Earlier QES have not necessarily omitted important reporting components, but rather our understanding of what should be completed and reported has grown considerably. The variability in reporting quality within QESs and MMRs underscores the need to develop Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) specifically for QES.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherWiley Open Accessen_UK
dc.relationGiltenane M, O’Mahony A, Bianchim MS, Booth A, Harden A, Houghton C, France EF, Ames H, Flemming K, Sutcliffe K, Garside R, Pantoja T & Noyes J (2025) Assessing the reporting quality of published qualitative evidence syntheses in the Cochrane Library. <i>Cochrane Evidence Synthesis and Methods</i>, 3 (3), Art. No.: e70023. https://doi.org/10.1002/cesm.70023en_UK
dc.rights© 2025 The Author(s). Cochrane Evidence Synthesis and Methods published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Cochrane Collaboration. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectmixed-methods reviewsen_UK
dc.subjectqualitative evidence synthesisen_UK
dc.subjectquality assessmenten_UK
dc.subjectreporting qualityen_UK
dc.titleAssessing the reporting quality of published qualitative evidence syntheses in the Cochrane Libraryen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/cesm.70023en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleCochrane Evidence Synthesis and Methodsen_UK
dc.citation.issn2832-9023en_UK
dc.citation.issn2832-9023en_UK
dc.citation.volume3en_UK
dc.citation.issue3en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.author.emailemma.france@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date15/04/2025en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Limerick, Irelanden_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity College Corken_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBangor Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Sheffielden_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSt George's, University of Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Galwayen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationCHeCRen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNorwegian Institute of Public Healthen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Yorken_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity College Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Exeteren_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPontificia Universidad Católica de Chileen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBangor Universityen_UK
dc.identifier.wtid2099839en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-0876-7030en_UK
dc.date.accepted2025-02-13en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2025-02-13en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2025-02-17en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorGiltenane, Martina|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorO’Mahony, Aoife|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBianchim, Mayara Silveira|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBooth, Andrew|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorHarden, Angela|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorHoughton, Catherine|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorFrance, Emma F|0000-0003-0876-7030en_UK
local.rioxx.authorAmes, Heather|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorFlemming, Kate|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorSutcliffe, Katy|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorGarside, Ruth|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorPantoja, Tomas|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorNoyes, Jane|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2025-04-28en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2025-04-28|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameGiltenane-etal-CESM-2025.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source2832-9023en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Giltenane-etal-CESM-2025.pdfFulltext - Published Version4.97 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.