Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1893/37117
Appears in Collections: | History and Politics Journal Articles |
Peer Review Status: | Refereed |
Title: | European Perceptions of Scottish Independence Before and After Brexit |
Author(s): | Anderson, Paul Swan, Coree Brown |
Contact Email: | coree.brownswan@stir.ac.uk |
Issue Date: | 2025 |
Date Deposited: | 30-May-2025 |
Citation: | Anderson P & Swan CB (2025) European Perceptions of Scottish Independence Before and After Brexit. <i>Irish Studies in International Affairs</i>, 36 (2), pp. 100-122. https://doi.org/10.1353/isia.2025.a960079 |
Abstract: | This article examines European perceptions of Scottish independence before and after Brexit, focusing on the responses of EU institutions and member states. While the 2014 Scottish independence referendum and the Brexit vote of 2016 are well studied from a UK-centric perspective, the EU’s stance on Scotland’s potential secession has received less attention. This study explores how the EU’s position evolved across three key periods: the pre-Brexit years (2012–2015), the Brexit negotiation era (2016–2020) and the post-Brexit recalibration (2020–2024). The analysis reveals a nuanced European response, marked by cautious neutrality that occasionally gave way to more supportive rhetoric in the wake of Brexit. However, the EU’s institutional stance remains largely unchanged, with Scottish independence and potential EU membership still seen as internal matters for the UK. The article concludes by considering the implications of these findings for Scotland’s ongoing independence movement and its future relationship with the EU. |
DOI Link: | 10.1353/isia.2025.a960079 |
Rights: | This is an open access article licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
Licence URL(s): | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
project_muse_960079.pdf | Fulltext - Published Version | 423.5 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is protected by original copyright |
A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.