Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1893/38059| Appears in Collections: | Computing Science and Mathematics Conference Papers and Proceedings |
| Peer Review Status: | Refereed |
| Author(s): | Di Campli San Vito, Patrizia Fringi, Eva Johnston, Penny Bezerra, Leonardo C T Aristodemou, Marios Shahandashti, Siamak F O'Hara, Emily Fiona Whyte, Laura Luo, Lin Wong, Mark Soufan, Ayah Moshfeghi, Yashar Stumpf, Simone |
| Contact Email: | leonardo.bezerra@stir.ac.uk |
| Title: | Empowering Stakeholders with Participatory Auditing of Predictive AI: Perspectives from End-Users and Decision Subjects without AI Expertise |
| Citation: | Di Campli San Vito P, Fringi E, Johnston P, Bezerra LCT, Aristodemou M, Shahandashti SF, O'Hara E, Fiona Whyte L, Luo L, Wong M, Soufan A, Moshfeghi Y & Stumpf S (2026) Empowering Stakeholders with Participatory Auditing of Predictive AI: Perspectives from End-Users and Decision Subjects without AI Expertise. In: <i>CHI '26: Proceedings of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems</i>. ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Barcelona, Spain, 13.04.2026-17.04.2026. https://doi.org/10.1145/3772318.3791757 |
| Issue Date: | Apr-2026 |
| Date Deposited: | 17-Apr-2026 |
| Conference Name: | ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems |
| Conference Dates: | 2026-04-13 - 2026-04-17 |
| Conference Location: | Barcelona, Spain |
| Abstract: | Artificial intelligence (AI) applications have become ubiquitous in their impact on individuals and society, highlighting a crucial need for their responsible development. Recent research has called for participatory AI auditing, empowering individuals without AI expertise to audit AI applications throughout the entire AI development pipeline. Our work focuses on investigating how to support these kinds of auditors through participatory AI auditing tools and processes. We conducted a series of co-design workshops, using two health-related predictive AI applications as examples. Our results show that participants wanted to be part of AI audits, and were insightful in identifying the potential impacts of applications, but needed to be assisted in conducting audits, especially how to measure impacts. Importantly, participants provided examples of impacts not considered in current risk/harm taxonomies. Our findings provide implications for the design of tools and processes to empower everyone to contribute to responsible AI development in the future. |
| Status: | VoR - Version of Record |
| Rights: | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. |
| Licence URL(s): | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3772318.3791757.pdf | Fulltext - Published Version | 34.16 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is protected by original copyright |
A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.
