Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/35817
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Transcranial magnetic stimulation over supramarginal gyrus stimulates primary motor cortex directly and impairs manual dexterity: Implications for TMS focality
Author(s): Holmes, Nicholas P
Di Chiaro, Nunzia Valentina
Crowe, Emily M
Marson, Ben
Göbel, Karen
Gaigalas, Dominykas
Jay, Talia
Lockett, Abigail V
Powell, Eleanor S
Zeni, Silvia
Reader, Arran T
Contact Email: arran.reader@stir.ac.uk
Keywords: corticospinal excitability
manual dexterity
mapping
movement
pegboard
Issue Date: 1-Feb-2024
Date Deposited: 8-Feb-2024
Citation: Holmes NP, Di Chiaro NV, Crowe EM, Marson B, Göbel K, Gaigalas D, Jay T, Lockett AV, Powell ES, Zeni S & Reader AT (2024) Transcranial magnetic stimulation over supramarginal gyrus stimulates primary motor cortex directly and impairs manual dexterity: Implications for TMS focality. <i>Journal of Neurophysiology</i>, 131 (2), pp. 360-378. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00369.2023
Abstract: Based on human motor cortex, the effective spatial resolution of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is often described as 5–20 mm, because small changes in TMS coil position can have large effects on motor-evoked potentials (MEPs). MEPs are often studied at rest, with muscles relaxed. During muscle contraction and movement, corticospinal excitability is higher, thresholds for effective stimulation are lower, and MEPs can be evoked from larger regions of scalp, so the effective spatial resolution of TMS is larger. We found that TMS over the supramarginal gyrus (SMG) impaired manual dexterity in the grooved pegboard task. It also resulted in short-latency MEPs in hand muscles, despite the coil being 55 mm away from the motor cortex hand area (M1). MEPs might be evoked by either a specific corticospinal connection from SMG or a remote but direct electromagnetic stimulation of M1. To distinguish these alternatives, we mapped MEPs across the scalp during rest, isotonic contraction, and manual dexterity tasks and ran electric field simulations to model the expected M1 activation from 27 scalp locations and four coil orientations. We also systematically reviewed studies using TMS during movement. Across five experiments, TMS over SMG reliably evoked MEPs during hand movement. These MEPs were consistent with direct M1 stimulation and substantially decreased corticospinal thresholds during natural movement. Systematic review suggested that 54 published experiments may have suffered from similar motor activation confounds. Our results have implications for the assumed spatial resolution of TMS, and especially when TMS is presented within 55 mm of the motor cortex.
DOI Link: 10.1152/jn.00369.2023
Rights: Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution CC-BY 4.0. Published by the American Physiological Society.
Licence URL(s): http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Holmes et al (2024).pdfFulltext - Published Version3.19 MBAdobe PDFView/Open



This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.